effective tips for crafting realistic dialogue
- Michael David
- Jan 7
- 3 min read
Updated: Jan 19
Here are practical, play-specific notes on dialogue — the kind that matters in rehearsal, not just on the page:
Dialogue is action
In plays, speech replaces narration. Every line should do something:
pursue a want
block another character
reveal a decision
change the power dynamic
If a line could be removed without altering the scene’s trajectory, it’s decorative.
Characters don’t speak to inform the audience
Exposition must be motivated.
Characters speak because:
they need leverage
they are hiding something
they are trying to win
If a line exists only so the audience “understands,” it will sound false on stage.
People rarely answer the question they’re asked
Strong dialogue is oblique:
dodge → counter → redirect
answer emotionally, not logically
speak past each other
Direct answers flatten tension.
Power lives in rhythm, not words
Onstage, power is shaped by:
who interrupts
who changes the subject
who forces silence
who speaks last
Short lines can dominate long speeches. Silence can win a scene.
Subtext is the engine
What matters is what can’t be said:
social rules
shame
desire
fear
If characters say exactly what they mean, the scene ends too quickly.
Dialogue must be speakable
Plays are written for bodies in space:
breath matters
consonants matter
repetition is natural
grammar is optional
Read lines aloud. If an actor has to “act around” the language, rewrite it.
Each character has a verbal fingerprint
Listen for:
sentence length
metaphor habits
humor or avoidance
certainty vs. qualification
If lines can be swapped between characters, the dialogue isn’t finished.
The best dialogue creates trouble
A strong line should:
escalate the scene
force a response
make the next beat unavoidable
Good dialogue doesn’t decorate moments — it corners characters.
Some examples of good dialogue
Annie Baker — The Flick
Why it matters: Silence, hesitation and banality as pressure.
“I don’t know. I just — yeah.”
What’s happening:
The line refuses completion
The pause is the action
Emotional avoidance replaces exposition
Baker’s dialogue trusts the audience to listen between words. Nothing is explained; everything accumulates.
Lynn Nottage — Sweat
Why it matters: Class conflict encoded in everyday speech.
“You don’t know what loyalty is.”
What’s happening:
Simple vocabulary, loaded accusation
Moral judgment replaces argument
Past friendship collapses in one line
Nottage lets ordinary language carry historic weight — no speeches, no slogans.
Branden Jacobs-Jenkins — An Octoroon
Why it matters: Meta-theatrical dialogue that attacks the form itself.
“This is the part where we pretend not to notice.”
What’s happening:
Dialogue names the audience’s complicity
Humor masks accusation
Breaks theatrical comfort without stopping the play
The line doesn’t advance plot — it destabilizes the contract.
Tracy Letts — August: Osage County
Why it matters: Aggression disguised as honesty.
“I’m just telling the truth.”
What’s happening:
Violence framed as virtue
Emotional cruelty justified as clarity
The phrase repeats until it curdles
Letts uses repetition to show how language becomes a weapon.
Caryl Churchill — Love and Information
Why it matters: Fragmentation as meaning.
“I know this about you.”
What’s happening:
Context withheld
Intimacy implied, not defined
Audience completes the thought
Churchill’s dialogue often functions like a theorem: minimal inputs, expansive consequences.
Lucas Hnath — A Doll’s House, Part 2
Why it matters: Argument as dramatic engine.
“I don’t believe in compromise.”
What’s happening:
Ideology stated plainly
No metaphor, no poetry
Stakes rise because the position is absolute
Hnath writes clean, philosophical dialogue that sharpens conflict instead of softening it.
What these plays share
Good dialogue tends to:
Understate rather than explain
Let conflict live in phrasing, not speeches
Trust the actor’s body and silence
Use language to withhold, not reveal

Comments