true story or true-ish story?

“Based on” and “Inspired by” look similar on a poster … but they behave very differently on the page and legally.

Let’s untangle it.

“Based On”

This means you’re tethered to something specific and recognizable.

• A real person

• A true event

• A book/article/podcast

• A court case

• A historical incident

You’re implying: this is that story.

Pros

• Built-in stakes

• Cultural resonance

• Marketing shorthand

• Reality gives you strange, juicy details you’d never invent

Cons

• Research burden

• Fact-check anxiety

• Legal/IP concerns (if it’s not public domain)

• Audiences expect accuracy

Dramaturgically, you’re wrestling with:

• What do I compress?

• What do I omit?

• What truth am I protecting?

• Where do I depart?

“Based on” invites comparison.

“Inspired By”

This is looser. You’re harvesting themes, energy, or a real-life spark — but you’re not reenacting.

You’re saying: this story grew out of that one.

Pros

• More freedom

• You can combine sources

• No obligation to historical accuracy

• Cleaner legally (generally)

Cons

• Less built-in recognition

• You must generate your own engine

“Inspired by” invites interpretation.

The Real Question Isn’t Legal — It’s Structural

Ask yourself:

• Do I want to argue with history … or invent it?

• Is the real story more interesting than what I could imagine?

• Am I writing to illuminate a known figure/event … or to explore a theme that just happens to echo one?

Sometimes the strongest move is:

Start “based on” in research …End “inspired by” in execution.

That’s where you get something that feels true without being trapped by fact.