top of page

the protagonist–antagonist relationship: why stories need conflict

  • Writer: Michael David
    Michael David
  • Jan 30
  • 2 min read

In most stories:

  • Protagonist = the character whose goal/need drives the plot. They make the key choices, take the biggest risks and experience the main change (or refusal to change).

  • Antagonist = whatever most actively blocks that goal. This can be a person, but also a system, a force of nature, a community, a lover, an institution, time, addiction, grief, shame, etc.


A quick way to spot them:

What does someone want, specifically? → that’s usually your protagonist.

What keeps them from getting it, scene after scene? → that’s your antagonist (or antagonistic force).


Two common twists that trip people up:

  1. The antagonist isn’t always “the villain.” They might be right, or sympathetic — just in the way.

  2. You can have multiple antagonists, but usually one is the primary pressure that makes the story move.


Here are solid modern-classic play examples where the protagonist/antagonist dynamic is clear — even when the “antagonist” is a system, a belief or an inner engine:


  • Death of a Salesman (Arthur Miller)

o   Protagonist: Willy Loman

o   Antagonist: the success myth / Willy’s delusion (and the economic system

that rewards it)


  • A Streetcar Named Desire (Tennessee Williams)

o   Protagonist: Blanche

o   Antagonist: Stanley (and the blunt force of “reality”)


  • The Crucible (Arthur Miller)

o   Protagonist: John Proctor

o   Antagonist: theocratic mass hysteria (embodied by Danforth/Abigail)


  • A Raisin in the Sun (Lorraine Hansberry)

o   Protagonist: the Younger family (often Walter Lee as driver)

o   Antagonist: racism + housing discrimination (embodied by Karl Lindner)


  • Fences (August Wilson)

o   Protagonist: Troy Maxson

o   Antagonist: Troy’s pride/bitterness (and the racist limits he internalizes)


  • Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (Edward Albee)

o   Protagonist: George & Martha (as a unit)

o   Antagonist: each other’s games — and the void they’re protecting with them


  • Waiting for Godot (Samuel Beckett)

o   Protagonist: Vladimir & Estragon

o   Antagonist: time/meaninglessness/stasis (the “waiting” itself)


  • Glengarry Glen Ross (David Mamet)

o   Protagonist: Shelly Levene

o   Antagonist: capitalist incentive system (embodied by Williamson/Mitch &

Murray’s pressure)


  • Top Girls (Caryl Churchill)

o   Protagonist: Marlene

o   Antagonist: patriarchy wearing a “success” mask (and Marlene’s buy-in)


  • True West (Sam Shepard)

o   Protagonist: Austin

o   Antagonist: Lee (and the identity crisis of masculinity)


  • Angels in America (Tony Kushner)

o   Protagonist: Prior Walter (and Harper/Louis as parallel engines)

o   Antagonist: AIDS-era abandonment + political cynicism (embodied by Roy

Cohn)


  • Topdog/Underdog (Suzan-Lori Parks)

o   Protagonist: Lincoln

o   Antagonist: Booth (and the rigged script of history/identity they’re trapped in)


  • Ruined (Lynn Nottage)

o   Protagonist: Mama Nadi

o   Antagonist: war’s economy (violence as the governing system)

Recent Posts

See All
bad ideas with an excellent plot

There’s a quiet truth about theatre that only reveals itself once you’ve sat through enough opening nights, enough brave experiments, enough beautiful misfires: Theatre is bad ideas with an excellent

 
 
 
why subtext fails (and how to recognize it early)

Subtext is one of those things everyone praises in theory and quietly mistrusts in practice. When it works, it feels like intelligence passing between people without friction. When it fails, it feel

 
 
 
writing a play backward (on purpose)

There’s a quiet confidence in a play that knows where it’s going. You feel it not as certainty, exactly, but as pressure — like something inevitable is drawing the characters forward. One way to ach

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

Copyright © 2017-2026

bottom of page