top of page

should you leave at intermission?

  • Writer: Michael David
    Michael David
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • 1 min read

Usually?  No.


But the question matters because intermission is the moment of choice.


In a play, intermission isn’t just a break — it’s a referendum.  The audience has enough information to decide whether the contract still holds.  Staying means: I’m willing to see this through, even if it changes.  Leaving means: The pressure hasn’t earned my time.


What’s telling is that film doesn’t allow this question.  If at home, you can pause, sure — but you’re not making a public choice. Intermission in theater exposes commitment.  It reveals fatigue, doubt, curiosity, hope.


From a storytelling perspective:

  • Act I persuades.

  • Intermission tests.

  • Act II either deepens or collapses the promise.


So, do I leave at intermission?


Only when I foresee that a bad play is not going to get better in Act II.  And the play has already told me everything it’s capable of telling.

Recent Posts

See All
my 20 favorite plays

An admittedly subjective list below, in no particular order, but first ... What are yours? [more]

 
 
 
is an intermission necessary?

Short answer: no.  An intermission is never necessary when writing a play.  It’s a choice, and often a practical one rather than an artistic requirement. Historically, intermissions existed for very

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

Copyright © 2017-2026

bottom of page