top of page

have standing ovations become meaningless?

  • Writer: Michael David
    Michael David
  • Mar 2
  • 1 min read

Not meaningless.  But absolutely … inflated.


Here’s what happened.


The Inflation Problem


Once upon a time, a standing ovation meant:

  • The audience was stunned.

  • Something transcendent just happened.

  • You physically could not remain seated.


Now?


It often means:

  • “That was worth my time.”

  • “The lead actor is famous.”

  • “I don’t want to be the only one sitting.”

  • “The show ended and that’s what we do.”

  • It's the first step to heading out the door.


It’s like the standing ovation got upgraded to a default setting.

Who Stands?


Tourists stand.

Subscribers stand.

Friends of cast members stand.

The couple who paid $379 per ticket and need to justify it stand.


And then everyone else stands because social gravity is real.


It’s a cascade.


The Psychology of It


There’s real behavioral science here:

  • Social proof — if others stand, it must be good.

  • Norm signaling — you don’t want to look cold.

  • Emotional contagion — energy spreads quickly.

  • Sunk cost rationalization — you want the experience to feel worth it.


The first five people determine the outcome.

So … Are They Worthless?


Not exactly.


There are still moments when:

  • The room goes electric.

  • People stand instantly.

  • Applause is chaotic, not polite.

  • You feel slightly stunned.


That kind of ovation still means something.


But the average post-show stand-up? It’s closer to a cultural reflex than a judgment.


My hot take:


Standing ovations didn’t become meaningless.


They became democratized.


And when everything is exceptional, nothing is exceptional.

Recent Posts

See All
laughter that moves like weather

The best laughter doesn't behave like dialogue. It behaves like weather. You can feel it coming before it arrives. A shift in the atmosphere. A pressure change. Someone smiles before they speak.

 
 
 
what survives after closing night

Theatre is the only major art form that is designed to disappear. A novel remains on the shelf. A film can be streamed decades later. A painting hangs in a museum, growing more valuable with age.

 
 
 
streaming vs. stage: can they coexist?

Streaming and live theatre are often framed as competitors, but history suggests a different story. Every major entertainment technology — from radio to television to film — was predicted to destroy

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

Copyright © 2017-2026

bottom of page